Are you concerned?

The person or organisation concerned by a profile, or their representative, can reply to it. The reply is checked by the editorial team before publication; it is then shown under the controversy concerned, in its original language, without machine translation.

Who are you? The person concerned The entity concerned Their representative (lawyer or authorised agent)

Only the person concerned or their representative can make this request. To report an error, use Request an update.

Name Positione.g. lawyer, head of communications

E-mailThe address is never published. The editorial team will contact you to check your capacity. Without verification, the request is closed after 14 days.

Controversy or controversies concernedNo box ticked: the reply concerns the whole profile. Contentieux initié par Tianqi contre le traitement réglementaire du partenariat Codelco–SQM Rejet définitif du recours de Tianqi par la Cour suprême chilienne Encadrement concurrentiel de la participation de Tianqi par la FNE Nouvelle demande d’informations de la SEC sur conformité et allégations anticorruption Clôture de la surveillance FNE sur Tianqi sans manquement détecté Contentieux fiscal de SQM Nitratos : revirement en appel et pourvoi en cassation Programme de conformité environnementale évalué à 25 M$ Accord FCPA avec le DOJ et la SEC : pénalités et monitoring Six charges environnementales au Salar de Atacama, principalement liées à la saumure Paiements politiques et insuffisances de contrôle interne reconnues dans le dossier FCPA Développement du lithium au Salar de Atacama Constitution et évolution de SQM vers un groupe privé international

Your reply2,000 characters maximum. Language of the replyThe reply is published as is, in this language. Links to supporting public documents (optional)One link per line, 5 maximum. No attachment or identity document is requested. I have read and accept the participation charter. Website

To prevent abuse, the approximate location of your connection is recorded with your request.

CONTROVERSIA

A documented archive of public controversies.

Search Categories Methodology About Participation charter Legal requests Privacy Terms of use App My followed profiles

Being listed in this archive, as a person or an organisation, is not evidence of wrongdoing. Legal statuses reflect the documented sources as of the date shown; they replace neither court decisions nor the presumption of innocence.

No ratings, no scores.

Search for a person or an organisation

Search covers names and aliases — not the content of profiles.

iPhone and iPad

Install Controversia

Tap Share
then Add to Home Screen

Tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.

New version available —